What does the Premise “a Deceiver Deceives me” Conclude? － Descartes’ Deceiver Argument Reconsidered
نویسندگان
چکیده
منابع مشابه
Catching a Deceiver in the Act: Processes Underlying Deception in an Interactive Interview Setting
Lying is known to evoke stress and cognitive load. Both form cues to deception and lead to an increase in sympathetic nervous system (SNS) activity. But in reality, deceivers stick to the truth most the time and only lie occasionally. The present study therefore examined in an interactive suspect interview setting, whether deceivers still have clearly diverging cognitive and emotional processes...
متن کاملThe Dream Argument and Descartes' First Meditation
It is a standard criticism of Descartes' dream argument that it must necessarily fail because it is inconsistent with itself: it has to assume the truth of what it sets out to deny. It concludes that there is no difference between dreaming and waking and that our experiences may be false delusions, while the premises, which liken waking to dreaming and assert the illusory character of the latte...
متن کاملInvestigating the "deceiver stereotype": do older adults associate averted gaze with deception?
OBJECTIVES Research indicates that the most commonly held belief about deception is that people avert their gaze when lying. The present study assessed adult age-related differences in both the association between averted gaze and judgments of deception and the strength of the "deceiver stereotype." METHOD In Study 1, younger and older adult participants were required to decide if individuals...
متن کاملSuzanne Last Stone Between Truth and Trust: The False Prophet as Self-Deceiver?
In I Kings 22, a lying spirit deceives King Ahab’s prophets into prophesying in unison success in battle. This strange and tragic story enlarges the category of false prophets to include those who are sincere yet mistaken. This biblical report of one of many clashes between true and false prophets offers a conceptually powerful tool for thinking through the human capacity and obligation to disc...
متن کاملMeasuring minimal change in argument premise revision
The field of belief revision studies how information can be given up in the face of new, conflicting information, while argumentation provides methods through which conflict can be modelled and the resultant acceptability of arguments evaluated. Prominent theories of belief revision depend on the notion of minimal change, measured in terms of epistemic entrenchment, to determine what beliefs to...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: Filozofia
سال: 2019
ISSN: 0046-385X,2585-7061
DOI: 10.31577/filozofia.2019.74.4.4